Historical and political aspects of the debate on the lifetime extension of NPPs in Germany
Abstract
In 2022, one of the challenges to the stability within the ‘traffic light’ coalition in Germany was the issue of operating the last NPPs beyond their statutory duration. The acuteness of the debate is due to a combination of unique historical and principle political elements. This article focuses on these aspects. From a historical perspective, the problem of building new nuclear reactors and the consequences of the anti-nuclear movement growth in the Federal Republic of Germany are discussed. It is argued that the anti-nuclear orientation of the green movement in the FRG fits into the categories of the Busan/Waver securitization concept. Numerous legal acts of the Federal Government of Germany (energy concepts; amendments to the Atomic Energy Act) as well as policy documents of individual parties and coalition agreements are used to analyze these issues. The second part of the paper coverages the political debate on the possibility of lifetime extention of nuclear power plants in Germany in 2022-2023. To address this, statements by leaders of the ruling parties as well as the opposition are used as sources of information. After analyzing the public-political debates around the NPPs, the author concludes that the unilateral decision by the German chancellor Olaf Scholz about the NPPs decommission no later than the 15th of April played a significant role in conflict resolution between the ruling parties within the coalition.
References
1. Belov V.B. Antikrizisnye mery pravitel’stva Germanii v sfere energetiki. [The anti-crisis measures of the German government in the energy sector]/ V. B. Belov // Scientific and Analytical Bulletin of the IE RAS. ¬— 2022. — №4. — P. 116–132.
2. Borovskij Y.V. Sek’yuritizaciya energosnabzheniya v ramkah Evrosoyuza [Securitization of Energy Supply within the European Integration] / Y. V. Borovskij, O. V. Shishkina // MGIMO Review of International Relations. – 2021. – Vol. 14, № 3. – P. 57-81.
3. Dmitriev D.A. 2:2, sravnyali. Zemel’nye vybory v FRG za 2022 g. [2:2, caught up. Land elections in FRG in 2022]. D.A. Dmitriev. – Blog of the Scientific Student Society MGIMO. Russian International Aff airs Council (RIAC). — 09.11.2022. — URL: https://russiancouncil.ru/blogs/NSO_MGIMO/22-sravnyali-zemelnye-vybory-v-frg-za-2022-g/ (accessed: 04.02.2023).
4. Sokolov A.P. Bavarskii atom [Bavarian atom]. // Russian International Aff airs Council (RIAC). — 21.04.2023. — URL: https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/columns/europeanpolicy/bavarskiy-atom/ (accessed: 06.07.2023).
5. Sovremennaya politicheskaya nauka: Metodologiya: Nauchnoe izdanie. [Modern political science: Methodology: Scientific publication]/ T. A. Alekseeva, A. A. Baikov, V. G. Baranovskii [i dr.]; Otv. red. O.V. Gaman-Golutvina, A.I. Nikitin. – 2nd ed. – Moscow, Aspekt Press. 2019. – 776 p.
6. Toganova N. Germanskaya energetika bez atoma: problemy prognozirovaniya razvitiya [German energy without atom: problems of development forecasting]. / N. Toganova. // Ecology and energy: local responses to global challenges : collection of articles based on roundtable discussion «Modern environmental and energy problems: local responses to global challenges» . — Institute of World Economy and International Relations of RAS, 2012. — P. 67-80.
7. Yudin N.V. Rasshirenie problematiki issledovanii bezopasnosti [Extension of the security studies] / N. V. Yudin // International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. – 2017. – Vol. 15, № 1(48). – P. 60-78.
8. Zarickij B.E. Ekonomika Germanii: uchebnoe posobie [Germany’s economy: Textbook]/ B.E. Zarickij. – MGIMO University; World economy department. Moscow: MGIMO-Universitet [MGIMO-University], 2019. – 488 p.
9. Zimakov A. Atomnaya energetika ES: ekonomika protiv ekologii [EU nuclear power: economy vs. Ecology] / A. Zimakov.// World Economy and International Relations. — 2014. — № — P. 16-19.
10. Zimakov A.V. Politika otkaza Germanii ot atomnoj energetiki: ot konfl ikta k kompromissu [Germany’s Nuclear Energy Refusal Policy: from Confl ict to Compromise]. / A.V. Zimakov. // Nauchnyi dialog. — 2021. — №10. — P. 359-377.
11. Buzan B., Wæver O. Security: a new framework for analysis. — Lynne Rienner publishers, Boulder London, 1998. — 239 p.
12. Buzan B., Wæver O. Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. — 594 p.
13. Schiffer H-W. Energiepolitische Programme der Bundesregierung 1973 bis 2017. // Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen. — 2017. — 67 Jg., Heft 11. — P. 35-42.
Review
For citations:
Dmitriev D.A. Historical and political aspects of the debate on the lifetime extension of NPPs in Germany. International Aspect. 2023;4(3):4-23.